Werewolf Killing: Please Start Your Performance Chapter 454: Mathematicians don’t jump if you don’t have inequalities


[Player No. 12 please speak]

"How about I get out today on October 11 or November 11?"

"Player No. 9 said that he can point people randomly to make pitfalls. When everyone starts to pass the message, there will be no handover. As long as the wolf dares to secretly click on the three wolves to pass the message, he will be able to infer who will be based on the wolf pit later. It's a wolf."

"This sounds reasonable at first glance, but it is really too difficult to play."

“One is that there are too many speaking turns. The Wolf can give words to the Wolf teammates in any round, and it is impossible for us to remember everyone’s points in each round so clearly.”

"If the second one is played like this, the Wolves will definitely gain something, but our gain is unknown."

"Player No. 9 said that we can find the wolf pit according to the wolf pit everyone clicked. The problem is that we are not sure who the wolf is. How can we find the wolf pit?"

"So try your best not to do anything showy, just fight normally, and don't mess with others after yourself, so as not to be misunderstood."

The meaning of player No. 12's words is already obvious. He does not agree with 9's play style and does not recommend playing according to 9's play style.

Because playing this way provides great convenience for the wolf to communicate, he can talk to the little wolf without thinking, and the wolf will become extremely comfortable.

It is very troublesome for the good guys to find the wolf. They have to identify the wolf first, and then backtrack on the wolf, and there is also the possibility of accidentally targeting the good guy who is in the wolf's trap. This is extremely troublesome.

In this case, why do we fight like this? Novel routines and gameplay are not necessarily better than the old methods, they should be more satisfactory.

“Although I don’t agree with the gameplay of player No. 9, I think there is a high probability that he is not a wolf, because from his speech, I can feel that he really wants to find the wolf and provides good people with New playing styles and ideas."

"To put it simply, he has a good attitude and doesn't sound like a wolf."

"To be honest, except for good people with big brains, I don't think a wolf would dare to speak like this. It's outrageous to blatantly deceive good people and let the wolf pass the message easily."

"Of course, maybe he's just so arrogant, trying to deal with his face, and insisting on creating an environment for the wolf to easily communicate, or maybe he can hit a shot when there is no date, just in case a good guy is fooled and becomes lame."

"This possibility exists in theory, but I don't want to speculate. If you think about logic with this mentality, there will be no good person on the field who can recognize it."

"Player No. 10 is following the trend of No. 9. He has a gangster side. It is not ruled out that he is a wolf and leads a wave of rhythm. Anyway, this head was started by player No. 9. If a good person wants to fight, he will only fight 9. , will not pay special attention to him."

"Of course, this is just my guess, and it may not be correct. I just want to say that I can temporarily accept player No. 9, but I can't accept player No. 10 who follows his logic."

"Player No. 11 has the same idea as me, and does not agree with 9's style of play. From this point of view alone, his reputation is smaller than that of player 10, but his identity is not as good as player 9."

"My ranking of the identities of the front positions 9, 10, and 11 is that player No. 9 is the best, followed by player No. 11, and player No. 10 has the greatest reputation."

"Please note that when I talk about gangsterism, the biggest comparison is with 9 and 11. If not compared in this way, the speech of player No. 10 is also okay."

“Because he reached a point that I very much agree with, that is, after the mathematician jumps out the next day, we must trust his personal test information and stop thinking about whether the result may have been affected by the wolf. ”

"This board is for us good people to make choices, so how to choose the most likely thing is to choose the thing with a high probability."

Player No. 12 made more detailed comments on the people who have spoken in the previous positions and ranked their identities.

Player No. 9 has the highest status, so you can temporarily recognize him. Player No. 11 has similar ideas to him and is better at it. Player No. 10 is the most wolf-like among the three of them.

The interesting thing is that 12 did not beat 10 too hard, but said that 10 also had good things to talk about.

In this way, the hostility of player No. 10 towards him has been reduced to a great extent, and it feels a bit like giving a sweet date a slap in the face.

As for him saying that he should show up on 10 and 11 today, it was actually a joke. So many people didn't hear their speeches, so it doesn't mean that today is the round of 10 and 11.

"That's what I think. We must pay more attention to those who are suspected of sending messages, especially when ordering wolf pits."

"As a good person, you should try your best to avoid being misunderstood by outsiders. As for how to do this, everyone depends on their own abilities. The eight immortals cross the sea and each show their magical powers."

"Oh, by the way, if mathematicians have verified that the equation is true, don't jump out. Let's continue to push. Because the equation is true, you have no shield. If the wolf knife falls on you at night, you will have to Die."

"But it's different if the equation doesn't hold true. There will be a shield at night, and the Wolf Sword can't do anything to you. When you get up the next day, you can report the person's information again."

"The most important thing is that there is a wolf in the inequality. We can choose one of the two to be happy."

Player No. 12 made this point very well. It is best for mathematicians to have the ability to protect themselves before jumping out, otherwise, they will have to take a knife at night.

Unless there is a pair of jumps, that is another matter.

Assuming that there is no wolf jumping mathematician on the field, it is best for her to wait until the inequality is tested before jumping, so as to maximize the effect and value of this card.

To be able to talk to mathematicians like this, player No. 12 is undoubtedly in a good state of mind, and there is a high probability that he is not a wolf.

That's right, it's just a high probability, because no one can guarantee whether he is a wolf, so he deliberately talks like this to give himself an identity.

But in general, player No. 12 can be temporarily recognized, and he will definitely not be able to find him on the first day.

[Player No. 1 please speak]

"Since everyone said that I should come out and get the police badge to lead the team, then I will not be stubborn. I will stand here with a gun and welcome the werewolves to dance with me."

Player No. 1 stood up and took a photo of himself, a hunter.

As for the last half of the sentence, welcoming werewolves to dance with each other is sheer nonsense. Unless the wolf has a brain problem, it will dance with hunters. Isn't it a good thing to live?

"After listening to the speeches of the four players in the front position, I don't know what you think, but I personally think that the speech of player No. 12 is the best."

"First of all, he analyzed why the play style mentioned by player No. 9 is not working. It is not that there is a logical problem, but that it is too difficult to operate in practice, and the gain outweighs the loss."

"But he didn't take advantage of the trend to say that player No. 9 is a wolf. Instead, he thought that No. 9 is a good person with a high probability. As soon as he said this, I felt that he couldn't afford the wolf card."

"Secondly, his definition of the identities of people 9, 10, and 11 was so good that it touched my heart."

"If player No. 12 is a wolf in this game, I think the good guy loses. Who can beat him?"

"In the end, Player No. 12 talks to the mathematician. After checking the inequality, he will jump out. If there is no inequality, it is best to just ignore it. I think about it and it makes sense."

"If player No. 12's trump card is a wolf, there is a high probability that he will not talk to a mathematician like this."

"Based on all the above reasons, I say that player No. 12 is a good person. If you can't figure him out, he is a wolf. His speech, logic and perspective make it impossible for me to find any problems."

Player No. 1 went through a lot of logic to recognize Player No. 12 who just finished speaking.

The reason sounds very good, 12 does not look like a wolf.

In fact, not only 1, but also good people with external positioning have recognized 12. His speech is indeed good, there is no doubt about it.

If player No. 12’s trump card is Wolves, then the Wolves are already invincible.

But then again, player No. 12’s identity is so well established, and he has never taken a knife, it will make people suspicious.

"Player No. 9 did not make any comments in his first position. It can be heard that he is trying to find the wolf. Although the method he said is a bit ill-considered, but as 12 said, a wolf probably would not have such strange ideas. ."

"So, I also think player No. 9 is a good person. At least I can't get involved with him today. It will depend on his speech and behavior later."

"I think there is going to be a wolf between player No. 10 and player No. 11. Let's put aside the logic of language and positional learning to kill them both."

"We 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, if there is no wolf, then we are the fifth company of good people. This possibility is too low."

"Although position learning is a bit bad, this is how it is in deep pushing games. Do you believe in five consecutive good guys and go to the outside position to find four wolves, or do you open a wolf in the 10th or 11th of the game? I think the majority of players The choices will be the same as mine."

"As for who has more gangster potential, 10 or 11, I think it's about the same. Player 12 said 10 has the lowest status. I think 10 is slightly better than 11. At least he didn't hit player 9 and recognized him as the other player. Coming down."

"As for player No. 11, he is quite hostile to 9. He said that 9 may be a wolf setting the pace. I completely disagree with this statement."

"With a board like this, the wolf only needs to hold on tight. There is no need to talk about oneself as the center of attention. People with good rhythm will lead it themselves, so they don't have to worry about it at all."

"If 11 can point to player No. 9, he may be a wolf, but I am not very good at his identity."

In terms of the identity definitions of 10 and 11, player 1 and player 12 still have some differences.

12 thinks that 10’s identity is the worst, and 11 is slightly better. But 1 is just the opposite. He thinks that 10’s identity is better than 11, and he is sure that there is a wolf among 10 and 11.

"I'm not polite about the police badge. Today I will lead the team to return the votes, but if I return the wrong votes, don't blame me. In this kind of deep push, no one can say that I will definitely get the right wolf." ."

"My goal is what player No. 9 said, try not to attribute votes to the **** card, and on this basis, run like a wolf and push."

"Okay, that's all I want to say to the police, that's it, it's over."

[Player No. 2 please speak]

"Yes, I completely agree with the idea of ​​player No. 1, the wolf must be chosen among 10 and 11."

"If they are not wolves, then they are not good people from the fifth company, but good people from the sixth company, because I am not a wolf."

"Actually, both No. 10 and No. 11 have bad aspects or not very good points, but the aspects are different."

"After hearing 9's new style of play, player No. 10 actually praised it. I didn't understand it. 9 just went crazy on his own, and he also went crazy with him. After listening to their speeches, the wolf , I’m afraid I’ll die from happiness.”

"I didn't point out the problem of player No. 9, but just followed the trend and took the lead. This is where No. 10 is like a wolf."

"The problem with player No. 11 is that Pan 9 is a wolf. Although I dare not say that 9 is definitely a good person, judging from the current situation, it is unlikely that Pan 9 will fall into the wolf's pit with his eyes closed."

"His definition of 9's identity was wrong, and the gangster side suddenly became apparent."

"If I had to say who is the wolf between the two, I think it is player No. 11, because No. 11 has more murderous intentions. He played both No. 9 and No. 10, as if he was looking for an anti-push position."

"But player No. 10 is different. He recognized No. 9, which is equivalent to compressing the living space of himself and his wolf teammates. This behavior is not like a wolf."

Player No. 2 is very hostile to 10 and 11, because he has recognized 9 and 12, and player No. 1 is a hunter. In this case, if 10 and 11 do not produce a wolf, he will have to take the game. Good people from the Sixth Company.

Sixth Company is a good guy, what’s the concept? To put it bluntly, you may not encounter such a pattern even if you play a hundred games.

So, Player No. 2 is more certain than Player No. 1 that there are wolves among No. 10 and No. 11, and he talked about the ways in which these two people resemble wolves respectively. Generally speaking, it is relatively objective.

"Player No. 1 thinks that 10 and 11 are the wolves. Player No. 12 also thinks that 10 and 11 are unlikely to be good people. I think there is something wrong with 10 and 11, so let's vote among them today. ”

"The police will take IDs of 10 and 11 people. If they are both civilians, they will speak out. If one of them shows their identity, the other one will resist the push."

"This is what I think about the mathematician card."

"When the wolf uses its skills at night, will it turn good people into wolves, or will it turn wolves into good people to interfere with the results of the mathematician's inspection?"

"I think most people will choose the latter when it comes to wolf teammates, turning wolf teammates into good people, so that the possibility of mathematicians testing inequalities will become smaller."

"And after mathematicians verify an equation, they basically don't know whether the equation is a double wolf, but only a double good person, right?"

“Anyway, I think it’s the wisest choice for Stray Wolf to use his skills on his teammates to turn them into good people.”

“Unless the mathematician detects two wolves at the same time, it will be self-defeating and produce an inequality. Otherwise, the probability of the mathematician testing the inequality is quite low.”

"As long as a mathematician can't test inequalities, he can't have a shield or use his skills to find wolves."

"This is still when there is no wolf out. If a wolf is pushed out on the first day, and at night the wolf turns a teammate into a good person, where can mathematicians go to test the inequality? It is difficult to test Arrived."

"Having said so much, I just want to tell the good people that if a mathematician detects an inequality, there is no doubt that there must be a wolf in it. It is almost impossible that there are two good people, and one of them has been used by the wolf."

"On the other hand, if the mathematician finds an equation, then we have to be more careful, otherwise there will be wolves in it."

Listening to Player 2’s speech, all the good people on the field fell into deep thought.

According to 2, there is a high probability that the wolf will change the camp of his wolf teammates and try to become a Wolverine as much as possible, instead of changing the good guy into the werewolf camp and trying to become a good guy.

In short, as long as mathematicians check the inequality, good people basically have no doubt that there must be a wolf in it, and it cannot be two good people. The sly wolf is not in the mood to get the good people into the wolf team.

On the contrary, it is an equation discovered by mathematicians. Good people do not say that there is a wolf in it, but they do have to be careful. After all, they are not afraid of ten thousand, but just in case.

The skills of the wolf and the mathematician didn't come together once, but twice? Even three times, there will always be times when we encounter it. The more times, the greater the probability.

Player No. 2 can talk about this, and his identity suddenly rises.

In the first half of the game, his conversation was very ordinary, with no highlights. When playing 10 or 11, he started to play wolf. He had to play between the two of them, and it was more like leading the rhythm to find an anti-push position.

But as soon as the second half of the speech came out, the identity of Player 2 skyrocketed. After all, he provided a new way of thinking for the good guys.

"There is only one player No. 6 under the police, so you don’t need to play him as a wolf. Not to mention that he does the opposite and plays the wolf under the police. It will be a bit frustrating to play like this."

"Actually, I not only don't want Pan Liu to be a wolf, I don't even want to think about him being a little wolf. I just go to the police with Pan Liu. Unless the police officer Liu's speech is particularly bad, otherwise, I will recognize him. ."

"And I think those who think that player No. 6 may be a little wolf are trying to stir up trouble. Whoever doubts No. 6 so much later will fall into my wolf pit."

"Okay, that's all I want to say to the police. I'm a good guy. I hope everyone can recognize me. That's it. It's over."

[Player No. 3 please speak]

"After listening to Player 2's speech, I already have a rough outline of my wolf pit."

"Because I recognized him. His previous speech was quite satisfactory, with no highlights. It was impossible to tell whether he was a good person or a wolf."

“But after he finished talking about what should be believed and what should be questioned about the test information of mathematicians, I felt that he was not able to afford the wolf card.”

"Because I thought about it carefully just now, and the logic of player No. 2 is correct. It is best for the wolf to become a Wolverine and use his skills to become a wolf for good people. At most, it can win a round for the Wolves. It’s just times.”

"Relatively speaking, the Stray Wolf really wants to use skills for wolf teammates and push wolf teammates into the good team."

"If Player No. 2 can talk about this, it is worthy of my temporary recognition. As for his other remarks, they can be ignored."

Player No. 3 got up and recognized 2. There was only one reason, that is, he thought 2 could tell mathematicians which tests they could trust and which tests they could not trust, and why.

This is the idea and logic that a good person should have. No one has talked about it before. Player No. 2 is the first to talk about it, so his identity is good.

"Player No. 1 is a hunter. I won't say much about this. He can not only ensure that the police badge is in good hands, but also create a trap and compress the living space of the wolves. I think it is pretty good."

"Some people think that you don't have to play any of the magic cards and it all depends on your speech. I don't think it's good. If even the police chief can't be sure that he is a good person, I'm afraid half of the game will be lost."

"So, the mentality and thoughts of player No. 9 are good. After all, he is the first to speak and the hunter will jump out. Don't jump if you don't have a magic card. If you jump out, you will get a knife or something."

"As for the play style mentioned by player No. 9, I can only say that each has its own pros and cons. He is right in what he said. If we strictly guard against the thief, we will not be able to defend against him. There is no way to guard against thieves for a thousand days. ."

"It might be an idea to completely stir up the water on the field so that the little wolf can't tell who is the wolf."

"Player No. 9 can think outside the box and come up with this unconventional way of playing, which at least shows that his intentions are good."

"It's a pity that player No. 11 can't even hear this, and he also suspects that No. 9 is a wolf who wants to set the pace. If he is really a wolf, I admire him, and he dares to blatantly help the wolf create opportunities to communicate, which is awesome."

"There is obviously a problem with the identity definition of player No. 9 in 11. He has the biggest gangster side, at least the biggest gangster side among all the people in the front position who have spoken."

"The identity of player No. 10 is pretty good, but whether he is a wolf or not is not certain. There will be a wolf among 10 and 11. It does not mean that they must be a wolf and a good person. They may be two wolves. ."

"Although player No. 11 stepped on 10, if 10 is a wolf, 11 does not know that this is the big brother card and wants to beat him to resist the push. This possibility also exists."

Player No. 3 has a very good impression and hearing of 9. He recognized 9 in a very firm tone. If there are no accidents, he may not be able to point out 9 as a wolf throughout the game.

However, he is very hostile to player No. 11, because No. 11 is suspected of taking the lead and pushing 9 into the wolf pit.

As long as he has a good mentality, how could he think that 9 looks like a wolf? His perspective and mentality are wrong, which means that 11 has a high probability of being a wolf.

As for player No. 10, 3 means to be determined. In his opinion, 10 may be a wolf or a good person. Theoretically, it cannot be ruled out that 10 and 11 are two wolves.

People in the front position say that wolves come out of 10 and 11, but they do not emphasize that 10 and 11 can also make two wolves. This makes it easy for people to subconsciously think that 10 and 11 are one wolf and one good person. He must Let me bring this point out and emphasize it.

"The speech of player No. 12 is undoubtedly very good~IndoMTL.com~The first dialogue mathematician has inequalities and then jumps. There are no inequalities to be stubborn. Putting aside other things, this logic alone That’s enough to recognize him as a good person.”

"The only part of his conversation that I was not satisfied with was his definition of the identity of player No. 11. He said that the identity of No. 11 is higher than that of No. 10. This is definitely wrong."

“Both player No. 1 and No. 2 in the back position talked about this. It seems that everyone’s eyes are sharp. Even the 12th person who speaks like this will still be picked if he gives the wrong identity definition. Come out."

"There is only player No. 6 under the police. If he is selected out again and the four wolves join the police, the wolf pit will be very crowded."

"I'm afraid there will be two or three wolves in the 4, 5, 7, and 8 positions behind the police. I will focus on listening to what they talk about. There is no way to do this. Whoever puts the people in the front position has a better identity. ”

"Okay, that's all I want to say to the police. He has a good card. If there are no accidents today, my vote will be on player No. 11. That's it. That's it."

Please remember the first domain name of this book:. :


Leave a Reply