All I Really Want Is To Play Basketball: What does it mean to write the most crooked plot in the most reasonable way?

"I really just want to fight iron novels()" Find the latest chapters!

Before starting to complain, let Qiao give some cool knowledge to the handsome and super long guy...

Wow, author, your O'Neill is so strong! But why was such a strong O'Neal swept away? This story is very poisonous, it is too unreasonable, and the book is abandoned.

Wow, author, how can you write Jordan so strong? 10 consecutive points? I dare not write this in the novel, and I have achieved an average of 30+ achievements per game with a shooting rate of more than 50% in multiple seasons. It is unreasonable, too fantasy, and abandoned.

Wow, author, you write that Kobe scores 81 points in a single game, 4 consecutive 50+, is this reasonable? This is unreasonable! Such a strong Kobe, if he does not win the championship, he is very poisonous! Oh, I didn't win the championship, I gave up the book, it is really spicy.

Fuck, dog author, can you write a book? How easy is it to score a three-pointer! Is this still Curry you wrote? This is just a **** ratio! Understand the ball! Abandoned book!

Look, what else is my tortoise who averaged 30+ triple-doubles, Harden who averaged 60+ triple-doubles, and those outrageous data from Chamberlain in the ancient times...

This is a reality even more magical than a novel.

However, I believe that if an author dared to write the career of the above star into a novel without logic, he must have been sprayed to death long ago?

After all, fiction needs logic, but reality does not.

So when I wrote the story of Su Feng recently, I will repeat it. The attention is to repeatedly emphasize the importance of state to a star.

Because you may not believe it, if you look at JR's highlights, you may even think he is not much worse than Jordan.

But if you put aside the one-ball theory and the one-ball theory, how many people think JR is better than Jordan?

I think, even if it is a cerebral palsy author like me, I dare not say that, right?

Therefore, I no longer want to spend time discussing with handsome readers what is reasonable, because in fact my book is already the limit that I can be reasonable. If it is more reasonable, there will be a lot of logic. I'm afraid I can't make it back by myself.

From the timeline and Su Feng's career, his explosion is inevitable, because it is a kind of accumulation after accumulation.

And I have mentioned more than once that the reason for Su Feng's outburst is related to the fact that the top guards who are opposing him have not reached their peak.

To put it bluntly, Su Feng, who stepped to the top in advance, is enjoying the benefits of getting to the top faster than others.

Therefore, I mentioned in the book more than once that when you look at Su Feng's career, don't look at it from the perspective of one game or one game.

Because in reality, which star does not have a few famous scenes?

The crookedness based on rationality is something I have been doing all the time. As for fantasy and cliché... how can I explain, is it cliché for the protagonist of basketball to win the championship? Isn't it cliché, do you think I dare to write a novel about the protagonist's 20-year career and finally retiring without a title? Don't dare, because if you write that kind of text, you are not having trouble with money, you are having trouble with everyone.

And fantasy...

To be reasonable, as for Su Feng in my current writing, if he is really talking about fantasy, then I can give you a bunch of people who are more fantasy than him. In addition, this is also the relationship I will use a whole chapter when I was laying the groundwork for the Nets. However, now I have discovered that no matter how much you lay the groundwork, a small group of people means water and just skip it.

Anyway, explanation and preparation are just filling water. If you skip the explanation, you can confidently say that what you wrote is unreasonable, and then fast forward to not looking at it, not looking at it, this is not scientific, then it is not reasonable... ...Then please..... As a dog author, how should I write this book?

As for you, is Su Feng strong now?

Of course it is strong, because the protagonist in my own writing is not strong, who is strong?

So everyone can't beat him? Then I still have a look at it?

I'm sorry, I haven't said that.

Because please read carefully, in this book, I mentioned the word status at least 10086 times.

Is Su Feng eating?

Eat, of course, if I am writing a 2K game novel, why do you say I wasted so much to explain to you the objective reasons that affect the final result of the game on the basketball court?

However, why should you look at reality as you play a game?

Because one game can score 60 points, so it is equivalent to 82 games with 60 points per game?

Because of 60 points in two games, it means that everyone can't beat Su Feng?

The 81 points of Kobe and the 4 consecutive 50+ Kobe, why didn’t they win the championship for 10 consecutive seasons?

Then why did Jordan wait until the middle and late stages of his career to start his dynasty mode?

Then why has O'Neill been swept so many times?

Please do not look at reality in a one-sphere theory or a one-sphere theory, because my book is based on reality and then rationally created.

Su Feng will be in good form, there will be times in bad form, there will be 60 points in a single game, and there will be 17 of 47 shots.

In the real world, it is useless to evaluate players and refer to their ability values.

Because even the author of me didn't know the player's state before the actual game, and this is the "Schrodinger's state" on the famous basketball court.

So, let’s go back to the "Yu Xi" children's shoes in the end...

Don't impose the "reasonableness" you understand on a certain game of Su Feng and a certain season. Please enlarge your "reasonability" to Su Feng's entire career.

This is a novel about 20 seasons. This is not a story about a few games and a few seasons.

Please carefully understand the objective factors such as the state, physical fitness, opponent's state, opponent's physical fitness, tactics adopted by Su Feng, and tactics adopted by the opponent that I have been repeatedly emphasizing.

Please read every chapter in my pen carefully, including some chapters written just to explain the rationality.

Because I said, there is not a chapter in my book that is redundant.

Interlocking links is the essence of this book. A butterfly effect will bring about a wave of tsunami~IndoMTL.com~, and a wave of tsunami will inevitably bring about a whole era of change.

Why didn't I start adding Su Feng's outburst until after the HC rule was cancelled this season?

Why did I arrange for Honey Colum Martin to enforce this game, and the same.

I usually seem to be involuntarily describing. In your opinion, it is just a small detail for complaining or filling water. In fact, it has already laid the groundwork for Su Feng's outbreak.

And then, Su Feng's outbreak was not accidental, but inevitable.

It just depends on what his own state is and what he can reach.

Okay, Qiao went to bed, and when she wakes up, she will pick up the book and get back to business!

……

For the convenience of reading next time, you can click "Favorites" below to record this time (what is the most reasonable way to write the most crooked plot?) Read the record, and you will see it next time you open the bookshelf!

Like "I Really Just Want to Strike Iron", please recommend this book to your friends (QQ, blog, WeChat, etc.), thank you for your support! ! ()