The World of Deities: A small suggestion from Lao Huo, please try your best to take a look.

My recent situation is that after I finished the chapter at noon, I read the first round of book reviews in about half an hour, mainly to look for the hand errors and typos found by the readers, and correct them as soon as possible, so that subsequent readers can read more smoothly.

After that, in the evening or the next day, I will read the second round of book reviews and read readers’ feedback.

I saw some feedback recently.

For example, some readers said that they do not like the interaction between male and female characters. This is normal feedback. I can see it and I will find ways to improve.

However, some readers will say "These chapters are inexplicable", or "These chapters are poisonous." I think the motivation of these readers is "I want this book to look better". First of all Express thankfulness.

But here comes the problem. I have read these comments repeatedly. I really don’t know what the "inexplicable" is, or where the "poisoned spot" is. It is the character, the plot, and the action. Is it description, rhetoric, foreshadowing, or something else.

So, I hope that readers do me a favor. When expressing feedback, try to say "which specific paragraph or specific matter is problematic" so that I can understand it.

For example, how do I feel about Hult’s character.

For example, I think this rhetoric is too exaggerated. It's awkward to make milk or cream.

For example, I think the rolling performance of the five fire men in this episode is not good enough, it should be a bit more exciting.

Only when I say this, I can understand, otherwise I really don’t understand. Even if I break my head and want to improve, I can’t do it.

The reason is simple, each of us perceives differently.

I only discovered this problem recently. Everyone’s perception is like a ring. Everyone is using their own ring to cover things. Unfortunately, everyone’s ring is like our fingerprints or irises. It looks almost the same. , The reality is very different, so it has caused a lot of misunderstandings between people.

For those top people in various industries, either the circle is very large and can accommodate many differences, or there are more circles to cover different things. This is the realm I pursue.

Uh, I seem to have said too much, anyway, I can make it clear.

Let’s go ahead, let me mention a general three-step feedback mode

For specific issues, I think the flame goblin is a poison point.

The specific reason is because I think the flame goblin’s **** is not curled enough (squinting eyes and small expression)

, the specific improvement makes the flame goblin's **** a little bit more! For example, written in peach shape...

That's probably the case. Of course, if you are too lazy, just write the first two points.

Because the clearer and complete you write, the more clearly I read, the more likely this book will improve.

Otherwise, you typed for a long time and just didn’t make it clear. I was confused and might even have the opposite effect-this is the source of the misunderstanding between men and women. Don’t ask me how I knew...

Finally, thank every reader!

dhijianxian0

.