The World of Deities: Complete this testimonial (new)

　　 I read the comments from the last testimonial and realized that I had made another serious mistake.

　　 I feel that I cannot write the "principle" perfectly, and even feel that the principle is too great. I am an ordinary person without the confidence to write, and I am very unconfident, so I say that what I write is "reason".

　　 eventually caused a misunderstanding, making readers think that "Eternal Fire believes that the story is incompatible with the truth."

　　 Actually, I think that the principle and the story are difficult to be compatible, and the principle and the story are the perfect combination.

　　 Throw the subject first. The core of this book has always been the principle, not the reason.

　　 Principle and principle are never the same thing.

　　 This is my mistake. I failed to clarify the boundary between these two words in the book and in the testimonials.

　　 Principles and principles are overlapping but completely different concepts.

　　, the word basically has three meanings.

　　一, the affair, the rules, and the reason in life.

　　Second, a deeper meaning is also "the law of things".

　　三, in the ancient classics, the deepest meaning of truth is also the reason that Tao was born, and it is the extra attribute of Tao. No one can understand this thing. There are countless interpretations of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, without any absolute authoritative interpretation, so don't tell me any novel author can write this kind of truth.

　　 Then, in fact, the truth has only the first two meanings.

　　The most commonly used context of truth is almost all of the existence of "fuzzy perception" in terms of perception, experience, instinct, common sense, and life.

　　 Take the simplest example, the Pythagorean Theorem.

　　一, the reason:

　　 Now, a 3 cm wooden slat and a 4 cm wooden slat are placed at a right angle, so an adult told the child that the third wooden slat only needs 5 cm to form a right triangle.

　　 The child asked why. The adult said that this is the Pythagorean theorem. If the two right-angle sides of a right-angle shape are 3 and 4, the hypotenuse is 5.

　　 This is the truth, you can perceive it vaguely, knowing that it is, in essence, "what is this".

　　 There are some simple truths in daily life, such as rain on cloudy days, people have to study hard, and the soil can help the crops. These are all truths.

　　 Two, theorem:

　　The child asked further, what is the Pythagorean theorem?

　　 So the adults used various methods to prove the Pythagorean theorem.

　　The question is, who can prove the Pythagorean theorem with stories?

　　 I think no one can do it, and no one has done it.

　　If I go back to ancient times and write a cool section for the protagonist to prove the Pythagorean theorem, I would like to ask the readers. Is the Pythagorean theorem cool for the readers, or is it because the story makes the readers cool?

　　After the reader is cool because of the story, will he prove the Pythagorean theorem?

　　 Pythagorean theorem seems to be easy to prove, so let's replace the Pythagorean theorem with Fermat's Last Theorem.

　　 What is the result? The result is that the reader does not understand Fermat's Last Theorem, and even suspects that the author may not really understand it, but can understand the "truth" that "the protagonist proves Fermat's Last Theorem can shock the academic world", so That's cool.

　　The reader is refreshed because of the truth in the story, and in essence, he still cannot understand Fermat's Last Theorem, and will not feel any refreshing emotions from this theorem.

The 　　 theorem is "why a thing".

　　 Then, what is the principle?

　　三, principle

The principle of 　　 is why, it is the law of the law of things.

　　 The most rigorous way of proving the Pythagorean theorem needs to be axiomatized, which is like the content in "The Original Geometry".

　　All theorems should come from axioms.

　　 And the first principle that I repeatedly mentioned in the article is very clear, and it is the most core, indispensable, and indispensable fundamental proposition in every discipline.

　　four, what is the most important thing?

　　The most important thing is that the truth can be perceived, it can be vaguely realized in life, and it can be fully integrated into the story, because the story and the truth are perceptual, instinctive, experienced and "experienced".

　　Reading novels and watching videos is essentially the human body and brain experiencing or simulating experiences. They are all physical responses. Even if it is emotions, it is mainly the function of nerves and neurotransmitters.

　　 However, the principle is different.

The principle of 　　 is completely beyond the perception of the human body. This thing itself cannot be determined by humans. When Lao Tzu said "Tao", when Heraclitus said "Logos" talked with other Greek philosophers. This thing began to be brewed when everything came to the fore.

　　 Only then did we know that there is something indescribable in this world. That thing is the "first driving force" of this world, which can be called the origin or the avenue.

　　 Then, this avenue, this origin, this first driving force is the "first principle" of our entire universe.

　　 But the problem is that this kind of philosophical and perceptual "principle", because it is too general, is closer to a kind of truth.

　　According to the standard that we can do it if we understand it, do we really understand it? Obviously we don't understand it.

　　The true principle is the foundation of the field of knowledge.

　　Like Newton’s three laws, they are the principles of classical mechanics.

　　Who can tell me, a novel author, how to write Newton's three laws into a story, and then let children who have never learned Newton's three laws to understand classical mechanics by reading the stories?

　　 We can make up a story that the apple smashed on Newton’s head, making Newton want to understand Newton’s Three Laws, but the story itself cannot explain Newton’s Three Laws clearly. It must be "explained" or even rigorously proved. In this way, in the eyes of many readers, it is not a story but a preaching.

The principle of 　　 requires a rigorous certification process!

　　 does not make sense.

　　Officially, because the principle requires a rigorous proof process, I said that the story is incompatible with the principle.

　　Principles and principles are two-dimensional things.

　　 You can perceive the truth vaguely, but the principle, you have to give up instinct and use human reason and thinking to touch it.

　　 I wrote 3.7 million words, but I couldn't tell the readers the truth and the principle. It's because of my lack of writing ability. I'm sorry.

　　 Put simply.

　　 The reason why I say that the book of Gods is different is not because I am writing principles, but because I am writing principles.

　　 Although I feel that I have not been able to write the principle well, and have always used the theory to cover up, but I am really not writing the theory, I am writing the principle.

　　 Anyway, I don’t want to face anymore and I'm cheeky to tell the truth. If there are readers who still can’t distinguish between the principles and the principles, but still feel that the principles can be written in a story, then I can’t say anything.

　　 So, you can say that Eternal Fire is so thick-skinned that you can brag about writing principles.

　　 You can also say that Eternal Fire doesn’t understand the principle, but it writes the principle, which is too arrogant and can’t write well at all.

　　 You can also say that the story written by the guy Eternal Fire is not well integrated with reason.

　　 You can also say that truth and story can be well integrated ~ IndoMTL.com~ You can even say that someone can write the principle into the story, this is your freedom, but I personally do not recommend that.

　　 may be there in the future, but not now.

　　 Even the sci-fi masterpieces like "Three-Body" and "Me, Robot", the dark forest theory or the three laws of robots, no matter how good they are, they are separated from the principle by countless dimensions.

　　This article is just a rational discussion, and does not involve other things.

　　 is a metaphor:

　　After talking about the truth, you immediately feel that you understand.

　　The principle is finished, you don’t know what you are talking about, you need to mobilize your brain to think slowly in order to fully understand and apply it.

　　 Finally, I let out a long sigh. My writing skills really need to be improved. I wrote 3.7 million words, but I didn't let the readers understand that what I really wrote was actually the principle.

　　 This is my biggest gain from writing this testimonial, and it is also a signal that I will continue to work hard to lay a solid foundation for writing.

　　 Look, now I have the motivation to continue studying.

　　The final testimonial is over, no longer discussing the explanation.

　　 I went to study hard! Manually wrap a red belt around your forehead and make a fist with a small expression!

　　 for the new book!

　　(https://)

First set a small goal, such as 1 second to remember: 　shukeju mobile version reading URL: