The World of Deities: Volume 3 testimonials.
一, let’s talk about the content of the third volume first.
Actually, I have been laying the groundwork from the beginning, and some book friends should be aware of the specialness of Euclid from the beginning.
Even if I use the content of this entire volume, it cannot reflect the greatness of Euclid.
Whether in the real or magical world, Euclid’s greatness is beyond imagination.
The same is true for the greatness of Aristotle, and Thales, Pythagoras, Eudox, etc. are equally great.
Hmm... I know there are some controversies about the history of Greece, but it is not important. I even consider those characters as a symbol. They are just "representatives of the wisdom of the sages." What is important is that the wisdom of the sages is Existing, they promote the development of the world and benefit each of us.
They let humans surpass animals and make humans better people.
I won’t go into details, I haven’t gotten over from this episode, so I won’t go into details.
二, I always said before, some things will be said in the third volume or at the end, now I can finally say some.
Regarding the choice of this "World of Gods", I said before that I originally wanted to write about Eastern and Western religions, but finally realized that in an era when many things cannot be written, that type is impossible to write. Then, transfer the book.
Then why did I write this book this way?
I thought about it later and concluded that there are probably three main reasons.
First, I like it.
Although it is a bit headstrong to say this, I insist that an author can only write excellent works if he writes what he really likes and believes in.
Second, because some readers have said that they have read "The Holy of Confucianism and Taoism" in the previous edition many times, and even said it more than ten times.
This makes me a little frightened. I feel that I have not reached the level that readers say. Therefore, I have to work harder and write content that is worth reading ten times.
In other words, I want to write what I think is the most valuable.
I think so, and I do.
Third, I always have a question.
All the online novels I have read, including those with strong knowledge, are just writing appearances. Well, stop here, because there is no malicious intent to avoid misunderstandings, so I won’t go into details.
To make an intuitive analogy, all online novels are writing about the protagonist from the foot of the mountain to the top of the mountain. In the novel, writing about scenery, writing about the protagonist sweating, writing about the protagonist gritted his teeth and insisting, writing about the protagonist does not give up Ah wait, wait...
But, but, but, none of these novels touched on a particularly important thing, the method of behavior, the method of thinking, and the method of method.
I think, I can try to write.
Then, there was "The World of Gods".
um......
As for the summary of the full text, I cannot say now.
What can be said is that I was struggling to write the first volume, and the second volume was all entangled, but starting from the third volume, the more I wrote, the more stable I was like an old dog.
It’s not that I feel like I’m doing it, but that this is indeed what I want to write and what I like.
I admit that what I want to write is actually beyond my writing ability, but is this important? unimportant.
The important thing is that I believe I like it, I act and I try.
I tried to stand at the end of my life and ask myself, is it worth writing this "World of Gods"?
The answer at the end of life is, it's worth it.
三, many readers do not accept this type of web post.
However, online text is a diversified world, and the rules of the real world are overwhelming. If you have to follow the old iron law in the world of online text, is it too tiring? Up?
is like some readers saying that this book is too preaching.
I have no objection, but from another perspective, this is normal explanation and discussion, and it is part of the novel.
It’s just that, the problem is that I haven’t been able to write these things in a way that “popular readers like”.
Therefore, I accept readers’ criticism and do not object.
So, I will definitely focus on making improvements in this area in the next book.
On the other hand, I have to explain.
The content I wrote was either summarized and refined by the top big guys over a lifetime, or I figured it out from the big guys. Any single point, I can write a monograph eloquently.
Don't mention me, no writer in history can write so many things in the "method that popular readers like". Even if they write it, few people can understand it.
If writers can write those things well, what do philosophers and scientists do?
So, the problem is that it’s not that my writing is wrong, but that I have chosen a “writing direction that is not enough for the general public”.
Actually, I have two writing methods.
One way is to explain and discuss some points, and explain them in detail.
The advantage of is that as long as you look at it carefully, you can understand that it is another thing to do or not.
But the downside is that it ruins a certain reading experience, and it’s not so cool.
The second one is the normal way of writing, where knowledge and truth are written as pure stories.
But I can guarantee, really, I can really guarantee that if I don’t explain, no one but myself can see what I want to express.
Who dares to say that "Dream of Red Mansions" is not good, who dares to say that the various classics are not good? But why are the explanations of so many works varied?
Since ancient times, whether it is the Four Books and Five Classics, Tang and Song Poems, or Ming and Qing novels, all kinds of appreciation and analysis, even those scholars who make a living by this, can they really understand the author's own intentions?
can’t read it! I really don't understand.
For example, I saw the poetry appreciation that broke me the most. Among them, I appreciate Li Bai’s sentence "I am a madman from Chu, Feng Ge laughs at Confucius", saying that Li Bai laughed at Confucius, and some people said that Li Bai was disappointed in the officialdom, completely Make a clear line with the dark court.
Baidu, most of them are in this tune.
I really want to call those big brothers. First of all, in the allusion quoted by Li Bai, the madman of Chu is not "ridiculing" Confucius. People say this: "The phoenix is like a phoenix, and the decline of He De. Don’t admonish those who come. It's still chasing. That's all, that's all, today's politics are dead."
In the vernacular, the madman of Chu shouted loudly: Confucius is big, you are a dragon and a phoenix, why do you want to be an official in a ruinous place like Chu? You are the Phoenix diving into the mud puddle, forcing the grid to drop! Things in the past can't be changed, now there is still time to rein in the cliff, don't become an official. Those who are good officials now are too dangerous, so go back quickly.
Therefore, Madman Chu is a supporter of Confucius. He is not mocking or regretting, but admiration.
What does Li Bai mean by this allusion?
The big vernacular translation is: I’m Li Bai, that is, my eyes are above the top, my heart is arrogant, I should be like a madman in Chu, and refuse to be an official. I should be as cool as a fairy. But in fact, my whole life, like Confucius, is basically seeking officials. I hope I can really see like Madman Chu.
To put it plainly, Li Bai is a madman from Chu and Confucius at the same time. He didn't mean to laugh at Confucius at all, but meant to laugh at himself.
Besides, shouldn’t everyone know that the poet and the poet, in order to rhyme, in order to pretend to beep, can't write any frantic sentences?
These two poems are the portrayal of Li Bai’s life journey: At first he sought officials like Confucius, and then he kept hitting the wall like Confucius. In the end, he regretted Confucius like a madman of Chu. Like Confucius, let go of the mentality of seeking officials, and become a real fairy in the game world.
The difference between the two people is that Confucius has indeed been a high-ranking official with real power.
What the two of them have in common is that they both surpassed themselves in another field and reached the pinnacle of life, that is, self-realization.
The entire poem and Li Bai's entire life are filled with regrets and contradictions, and it's not about Barabara like the dark court at all.
So, I... I am not comparing myself to Li Bai.
Li Bai and Cao Xueqin can't write words that can be understood by professionally literate people. I am in the eternal fire. Why dare to write such a deep thing as a pure story and let the readers understand it?
So, I chose a way of writing that is too explanatory and explanatory~IndoMTL.com~ Suddenly I found that the level of the net writer is really high!
As for what I said I was preaching, I will explain it in detail after finishing this book.
What we can say now is, how we define it, we will get what.
What we believe, we will get what.
ahem, talk about business.
By the third volume, Su Ye has completely passed the growth period, and the explanatory content will be reduced, and I will be more restrained in self-expression in the later period.
Su Ye has obtained excellent thinking, has clear goals, and has mastered the right methods. Then, all of this will form a huge motivation to push him forward.
Next, what Su Ye has to do is to work hard and persevere. Under the guidance of thinking, use the correct method to go step by step and make continuous progress in the direction of the goal.
There are actually some things I want to say, but they are not suitable. After the book is over, I will talk about it seriously.
The third volume is officially over. Today, I mainly write testimonials, and at the same time I think about the fourth volume and subsequent plots all day, so there is no update of the text today.
will open the fourth volume tomorrow.
Finally, Xiaohuo thanks everyone who reads here!
.
Ask for a monthly pass!
Please remember the domain name of the book’s first publication:. The fastest URL for mobile version update: