Werewolf Killing: Please Start Your Performance Chapter 60: Isn’t this a primary school student’s side?

[Player No. 12 please speak]

"Isn't this a primary school student taking sides? Without even thinking about it, he must think 4 is a prophet."

"Don't tell me what the police are doing. The gargoyle happened to test that he was a prophet on the first night. It happened to be in this order of speech, so he took over the investigation."

"I don't believe it!"

"Player No. 3, your logic is correct. I must admit this. The situations you mentioned are indeed possible, and I admit it."

"But I'm sorry, I may be different from other players. I don't like deep and complex logic, low-probability events, and reverse logic."

"I will only correct the logic and only analyze the high probability situation."

"Because many times, wolves like to fight against good people and like to trick good people into taking advantage of small-probability events."

"But as long as I am certain, don't speculate on small-probability events, and don't fight against logic, the wolf can't deceive me even if he talks."

Player No. 12 is a very interesting person.

It can be heard that he is stubborn and accepts death, so he doesn't pay attention to Gu Feng's rhetoric and logic at all.

Of course.

It's not that player 12 doesn't understand, it's that he doesn't want to play in that direction.

He admitted that Gu Fengpan got a gargoyle and the police officer drove a wolf. These situations theoretically exist and are possible.

But after all, it doesn’t change that these are all low-probability events.

As long as it is a small probability event, he will selectively ignore it.

This is called staying the same to cope with all changes.

It doesn’t matter which level your logic is at, I will be waiting for you on the first level anyway.

If you lose, you lose, if you win, you win.

Proven by practice.

When he started playing like this, his winning rate actually became higher.

What Gu Feng is most afraid of is meeting this kind of player. His heart is as solid as a rock. No matter what you say, it will be difficult to influence him.

On the contrary, people who are as smart as monkeys are easier to deceive.

"No. 4 is the prophet. Player No. 3 jumps on the spot after receiving the investigation. It may be a wolf, but it is not ruled out that it is a gargoyle."

"But generally speaking, when the Gargoyle is attacked and killed, it will not jump on the spot, but will wait for teammates in the outside position to catch it."

"Player No. 3 dares to jump directly on the spot with No. 4, indicating that he is most likely a little wolf."

"Of course, it doesn't matter. Regardless of whether he is a wolf or a gargoyle, there is nothing wrong with him today anyway."

"3 said he killed player No. 8. In this case, 3 and 8 cannot be wolf teammates, and player No. 8 is a good person."

"There will definitely be a wolf among the police. The possibility that there will be no wolf among the three people is too small. And as I said just now, I don't care about small-probability incidents."

"So, we need to find a wolf among 2 and 6. It's hard to say who it is. Let's wait and see their vote types and listen to their speeches. Anyway, don't worry."

Player No. 12 really didn’t deal with those meandering things, and just straightened out his logic.

Gu Feng is a wolf, player No. 8 took over Gu Feng’s killing, and No. 8 is a good guy.

As for a wolf stepping on a wolf to gain status, wouldn’t he have thought of it?

No, he just deliberately ignored it and was selectively blind.

When playing with this kind of person, his ideas and concepts may confuse others when he first comes up.

But if you play two more games and become familiar with his playing style and personality, it will actually be easy to figure out.

However, the game matching mechanism in this world is completely random.

As a result, no one will be familiar with his playing style and habits.

So, it is indeed okay for player No. 12 to play this way.

His method of only correcting logic and considering high-probability events can be regarded as a new approach and not taking the usual path.

"Player No. 1 sounds like a good person, because he is hostile to No. 3. He is standing next to me just like me. He is a wolf if he can't be beaten for the time being."

"As for player No. 5, although she doesn't have any logic, as the first person to speak, it is normal for her not to have logic. There is no logic to the information."

"But her speech was indeed very sincere. If you go to the police to evade fares, just say that you are going to the police to evade fares. She is not hypocritical or pretentious. I still have a good impression of her. I will act like a good person for the time being. Disk."

Player No. 12 recognized all 1 and 5.

There is nothing wrong with the logic, but it is too hasty and straightforward, and you will encounter a problem, 1 and 2, what if the wolf steps on the wolf?

Does this logic apply to the chassis, or not?

He insists on his own ideas and does not play the game. If the outsider plays the game, how does he define the person who plays the game?

[Player No. 11 please speak]

"The 3 and 4 pair jump prophets, my police officer must be the player No. 4 on the side. Although the logic of 3 games is quite reasonable, it seems like that, but it is still a lie. Take the initiative to kill."

“And I am naturally very suspicious and distrustful of people who take action to investigate and kill people. I always feel that he is quibbling, deceiving, and using strong words to make excuses.”

"So, I still decided to side with player No. 4 when the police came, but I won't side with him to death."

"Anyway, player No. 3's logic is pretty good, and he talked about the possibility of why he accepted the investigation, which is quite good."

"Player No. 4 is a gargoyle, or player No. 4 is a little wolf fighting a prophet. These are all possible situations. The probability is definitely a little small, but it cannot be completely ignored."

Player No. 11 stood up and expressed his attitude and position.

He wants to side with player No. 4, but he won’t side with him to death because he thinks Gu Feng’s logic is pretty good and he has a certain prophetic aspect.

It was Gu Feng's behavior of taking off despite the investigation that made him deeply suspicious.

If that were not the case, just listening to the speeches, it would be Gu Feng who was a better chatterer than Player 4.

After a pause, 11 said again: "I feel that the No. 12 player in the front position is too stubborn. Looking at his posture, it is obvious that the No. 4 player on the sidelines will not look back in this game."

"To be honest, even though his stance is the same as mine, and his approach is indeed positive and logical, my impression of him is not very good. On the contrary, there is still a slight difference."

"I think if 4 is a prophet, I don't rule out that 12 sells his teammates to hit the barb. If 4 is a wolf, I don't rule out that 4 and 12 are both wolves. 12 is setting the pace and charging."

"In a word, Player No. 12 is very popular with me. No matter who is the prophet, he is probably a wolf."

Player No. 11 is quite hostile to 12 because he thinks 12 is talking nonsense.

Don’t think about counter-logic and small-probability events. If this is the case, why should good people be fooled around by wolves?

You must know ~IndoMTL.com~ Here, werewolves can communicate at night. With such a good opportunity, how can they not play tricks? Don't you want to discuss some tactics?

Since there are tactics and formats, it will definitely involve counter-logic and low-probability events, and even details that good people would never think of.

According to the gameplay and thinking of 12, what can good people do to find wolves?

So, on the surface, 12 seems to be having a decent conversation, but in fact, he doesn’t have the mentality of a good person at all, at least that’s what 11 thinks.

"If 3 is really a wolf, he went all the way to kill player No. 8. I don't think it is without purpose. There must be a reason."

"The biggest possibility is that there are 3 or 8 pairs of wolves, and 3 deliberately stepped on the wolf teammates to establish their identities. However, this method of establishing identities is too old-fashioned and it is impossible to deceive good people."

"So, the possibility of 3 and 8 double wolves is relatively small. I have the same view as player 1 on this point. 3 may do this because he wants to go against the good guys and improve his reputation as a prophet. ."

"There is another possibility. 2 and 3 are two wolves. It is difficult for 3 to define the identity of his wolf teammates, so he gave 8 a kill."

“No one in the front position thought of this, so my discussion can be regarded as providing a new idea.”

"Needless to say, Player No. 5, I definitely can't tell you that she is a wolf. People in front of me said that she has a good identity. If I sing the opposite, I will be asking for trouble."

"The police will treat player No. 5 as a good person first. The police will see how Player 5 stands aside and whether the wolf pit she ordered is correct."

"Okay, that's all I'll talk about. Player 4, 1 and 5 should be good people. 12 is more likely to be a gangster. Player 2 needs to focus on it. Player 3 and 8 will most likely not be able to become two wolves. That's it, it's over."